Mein Kampf as a piece of literature is very difficult to analyze critically because as mentioned in the last post there is no adherence to objective reality in the formulation of Hitler’s opinions and most of his life is shrouded in lie or self aggrandizement, often both. I feel like I have discussed this lens for, arguably, longer than any human wish to and thus I would like to shift my focus to the Nazi party a modern movement called the AFD and why the United States plays such a prevalent role in both of these parties’ discussions on politics such that we can hopefully better the Union. The totalitarian geist has always been an heirloom passed down in the United States from the depravity of slavery to the modern authoritarian movement guised as familial conservatism. The ability, at every turn, of the American government to cover herself in a veneer of wool is likely the exact reason why German authoritarian movements look to her as an industrious example of how to correctly control cultural continuity. Likewise when Hitler spoke on the plights of democracy his insinuation that it was too easily changed by impulse seems like it was a direct attack at the US democratic system more than the Austrian system. What Hitler failed to realize in his hateful incompetence is that the answer to the problem of the democratic system is to bring up more educated and more diverse humans. If the United States fails to increase the importance of education in the homefront then the US will likely stand as an example for authoritarian regimes until her light bleeds dim.