Prof. Al-Tikriti's FSEM

Author: Yippe

Modern Feasts

1730s Irish Poor

Ever heard of “Eat the Rich”? Well let’s switch that to “Eat the poor.” Which is much more likely to happen anyways. It already is.

The story is from the perspective of a good willed economic projector suggesting that the best way to take care of the rats of Ireland (aka the poor) is to have infants fatten up and sent to be eaten by the lords and wealthy British. Honestly, I thought it was a pretty funny text to read because of how gruesome and absurd some of it was. But it is also a good text to think critically about.

Swift used his skills in writing to create a story featuring the Irish poor sacficing their young, described as burdsome, to the British wealth as a representation of the British exploitation of the Irish poor leading to disease, famine, beggars, and poor livihoods. I could spend time talking about the history and context of the writing, but I’d rather go into what the work made me think of.

1730s British Wealth

Connection to our Society

In our world, in our own Country the United States, there are homeless, poor, immigrants, and an ever-growing working class that is used to the wealthy’s benefit in more ways than just profit. When I say wealthy, I more mean the elite. The few billionaires, politicians, and companies that withhold resources for no more reason than to keep the poor poor and the rich rich.

In our own state, there is an illusion of class. The homeless, the working class, the middle class, and the rich. I argue that there is only the working class and the rich. The working class that the rich keep poor through minimum wage, creation of false enemies (such as Trump with immigrants), and the abuse of taxation. Much like the British with the Irish.

2023 ICE Agents

Instead of true taxation based on income, raising wages, distributions billions of dollars to community and the people of our country, we are instead prompted to turn against our own people (legal vs. non-legal; homeless vs working; college educated vs. not college educated; democrat vs republican), raise our children to think about how they will make money in the future (rather than just pursing their favorite interest or best skill) all so the wealthy can keep their wealth and continue to use the common people to build on, regardless of their quality of life.

There are protestors and people who stand and shout “EAT THE RICH” but still are forced to return to the lifestyle where the Rich. Eat. US.

2022 Workers United States

A First Rate Material

Every heard of A First Rate Material by Sayaka Murata? If you haven’t, here’s a little summary.

A world where people, after they died, are turned into products for the living to use. A wife/fiancé, who loves using human made products, is trying to convince her husband, who is disturbed and disgusted by the idea, to start purchasing human products as a sign of wealth and status. The story’s themes are about consumption, normality, and inviduvualism. But I’m not really talking about the themes of the story, I would like to relate it back to work that I am talking about and a bit more on how it relates to our world.

Hail Mary

Christianity is well known for its patriarchal outlook and values, often leading to the objectification, mistreatment, and poor views towards women. Even so, there are many scenes where Jesus rejects this notion, and a newly revealed Gospel has added to the evidence.

A wealthy woman who was one of the female disciples of Jesus, stood and watched his crucifixion, and valued in a higher manner than the men around her by the Lord and Savior. Well, in the sense that she received information that the other disciples did not. 

The idea of a women having visions and personal teachings from the Savior and Spirit caused disruption in the story and in our world.

I have a few of my own thoughts when it comes down to what could and couldn’t be true here. Also, how this relates to the hidden and hersey cry of the Gospel of Judas. It seems that there is a pattern recurring of parts of the bible supposedly being found that challenge norms and issues of the Church that are then cast aside, saying to not be true. 

In the Gospel of Mary, the Savior puts forth the idea that sin does not really exist. Instead, the idea of “sin” is more or less the importance and actions taken as a person that may contradict and hold back the body from being undisturbed. Sounds a lot like Buddhism to me.

In the Gospel, Mary receiving a perceived position of power and prestige by having a vision of the lord and being taught a different way of worship would be a push for women in our world to also have a claim of importance and power, upsetting the idea of patriarcary.

The text is not widely known and certainly not taught. I personally found it to be very intriguing to read and think about. Putting the thought that valuing the materials around us and our world is what keeps us from entering the higher heavens and the only way to get there is to enter true inner peace may seem easy but could potentially be misinterpreted. It seemed that instead of living a simple life, to let go of the world around us and focus on our own universal understanding is the way to reach peace.

The teachings given to Mary, looking inward and letting go outside, are quite similar to that of what was given to Judas, a different story. Both of these newer found Gospels however have been rejected as true or serious texts.

Much like the Gospel of Judas, if the teachings from this story were taken seriously, it could cause issues and shift in power dynamics of our world. Denying that sin exists, would limit the Church’s power over it’s people. Also, considering that the Church often promotes the worship of objects such as the cross, communion, and preachers themselves, a revolution that these practices are what holds people back from understanding the High Heavens would cause discomfort among many.

The Gospel of Mary is a quick take on offering a woman a powerful position by being one of very few followers who are able to fully comphrend the Saviors teachings, rejected as it is now.

Holy Judas

Judas Iscariot is a traitor who forsakes the Lord Jesus Christ to the Roman Authorizes in exchange for money. He was cast away and marked in the history books as a villain. But upon new buried evidence, there may be another part of this story that the Church doesn’t want you to know…..

As someone who knows little of religious writings, I wasn’t quite sure how to take the Gospels of Judas as I wasn’t fully sure what I was reading. After rereads, research, and piecing together bits and pieces of what I do know of the Christian church and religion, I manage to complete a few ideas. 

The Gospel of Judas was rejected as a true text, stating that it was untrustworthy. I think, with a bit of a closer look, there are a couple of other reasons why it may have been rejected from the Church and its followers beyond it being “random”. 

First of all, let’s talk about the star of the show, Judas. Judas Iscariot was one of the twelve disciples and the one to turn Jesus Christ over to the Roman authorities to be crucified, receiving monetary compensation for the action. Because of his betrayal, Judas has gone down as a sinful and vicious man, retold and carried throughout history with a ruined name. The Gospel of Judas gives the other side, something I have no doubt a few here and there have wondered about.

The Gospel of Judas is a perspective of Judas being a confidante and almost a “chosen one” of Jesus’ disciples. Along with that, Jesus offers a teaching about the way to worship the higher holy spirit and the Christian God, and it is not the way that has been followed through the years. He claimed that the other disciples and many followers are worshipping lesser material gods due to their inability to find inner peace and understanding.

In the story, Judas is the one disciple who will rule over the others, as he has and will manage to gain the inner understanding that allows him into the higher afterlife. To do this, Jesus tells him that he will need to betray him and walk with a shamed name. This betrayal is the turning over to the authorities, obviously. And then the story continues as we know. Judas is outcast, Jesus rises again, and so on. 

What’s even more interesting than the whole Judas carrying out a sacred mission secretly, is that Jesus seems to reject the way of worshiping that the other disciplines have been following. He says that it seems most people remain materialistic and are actually worshipping lower gods, rather than the almighty himself. 

Now we are getting somewhere. A different teaching and idea, that could bring change to the Church, is surely to be rejected and considered heresy. Even if given by the lord himself. What Jesus is basically saying, is that the way of the Church is wrong and almost sacrilegious. If this passage were to be believed, the whole structure of the Church could collapse. 

The church runs based on the belief that in order to achieve peace and be in good with the almighty, you must attend, believe, and worship with them. This has given them great power and control over centuries in many countries. The Gospel of Judas could potentially make it out that the Church is a form of placebo worship, losing its power and control. 

Now could one text really bring down a century year old power house followed by billions…maybe not. But it would certainly bring to question personal beielfs and practices and over time, there were be a shift of power. What kind of shift, I don’t know. 

My take is based on basic research, understanding, and mostly what social media says about Christianity and my own limited experience with it. In terms of how a text like this might relate to a class called Forbidden Texts, the work offers a form of expression and teaching that changes the balance of already existing societal belief and foundations. So while it isn’t technically “forbidden” to read, it has been labeled as heresy and untrustworthy to keep the balance. 

Which isn’t ridiculous or unusual to happen in history. 

History is written by the winners. The Christian Church, whatever branch you are a part of, is a winner in the history books, therefore, they have full control over what is right, and what is wrong. 

© 2026 Forbidden Texts

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑