The careful time Swift takes before unveiling his plan really sells the satire. He pre-applauds himself stating that anyone with a plan to help for or find a place for these children would deserve a statue. There is about 5 pages of pure fluff to lure the reader into a sense that this is really a fervent passionate person dedicated to assisting the poor. The fluff does have some undertones of resentment and harsh labelling, but it only feeds into the narrative this is a emotionally stirred yet out of touch intellectual. Everything after comes as both a use of detail to shock the audience into considering their dehumanization of poor Irish immigrants, and also interweaves social commentary into an allegory of cannabalism. An example of this occurs when Swift writes that the food will be proper for landlords as they have already devoured the parents. The notion that the skin of children could be worked into leather for gentlemen and ladies could be seen as a nod to the fact the products created by the poor are taken and flaunted as symbols of opulence. To be honest the entire pamphlet almost came across as antinatalist and I think could be used as a criticism of their ideology. Moreover, the entire pamphlet could also be linked to the idea that broad answers to economic problems, regardless of their success in having an effect on the economy, are almost never morally in the right as the success of the economy is independent of moral principle. The sixth reason Swift presents discussing how mothers would care more for their children knowing their value and how this change would affect marriages is also perfectly sarcastic as it enforces the idea that when you dehumanize people and their relations to that of mares cows and sows it removes the humanity out of something like marriage as a whole.